Five, seven-point Likert-type statements are used to measure a person's attitude about an aspect of a company's social responsibility that involves treatment of its foreign and domestic workers (e.g., hiring, compensation, working conditions). The scale was called CSR Record Manipulation Check by Lichtenstein, Drumwright, and Braig (2004).
The scale is composed of four, seven-point statements that measure the degree to which a consumer has certain prices in mind when deciding if the actual price of a particular product is "good."
The scale is composed of five, seven-point Likert-type statements that measure a person's negative feelings towards a specified country because of its economic power over one's own country.
Seven-point Likert-type statements are used to measure the perceived value of a deal involving a certain product offered at a certain price. The product examined in the study by Urbany, Bearden, and Weilbaker (1988) was televisions and a three-item scale was employed. In the study by Grewal, Marmorstein, and Sharma (1996), a four-item version of the scale was used to evaluate a shirt.
The degree to which a person thinks the service provided by a business was fair is measured in this scale by seven, seven-point Likert-type items. As used by Andaleeb and Basu (1994), the scale related to the quality of service customers received from a car repair establishment.
Four open-ended questions are used to measure a consumer's beliefs regarding various aspects of a product's price.
Four, seven-point statements are used to measure the perceived fairness of the tangible outcome of a disagreement between at least two parties (e.g., retail manager and customer).
This five-item, five-point Likert-type scale is used to measure consumer attitudes about prices in general. A seven-item version of the scale with similar psychometric properties is also discussed below.
