You are here

Scale Reviews

Find reliable measures for use in your research. Search Now

Testimonial

The Marketing Scales Handbook is indispensible in identifying how constructs have been measured and the support for a measure's validity and reliability. I have used it since the beginning as a resource in my doctoral seminar and as an aid to my own research. An electronic version will make it even more accessible to researchers in Marketing and affiliated fields.
Dr. Terry Childers
Iowa State University

government

Six, seven-point Likert-type items are used in this scale to measure the degree to which a person believes that government agencies and officials are benevolent and honest with respect to the way a specified activity is regulated. Grayson, Johnson, and Chen (2008) referred to this measure as system trust-government.

The extent to which a person believes that there is a need for government regulation of programming (including commercials) aimed at children is measured by nine, five-point Likert-type items.

The scale is composed of three, seven-point statements intended to assess the importance a person places on maintaining a positive image in the community when it comes to deciding whether or not to air an advertisement. As studied by Wicks and Abernethy (2001), the respondent was a TV sales manager or other station employee who was familiar with the station's clearance policy. Further, the type of advertisement they examined was infomercials.

Sixteen, five-point Likert-type statements are used to measure a person's attitude about a wide range of ecological issues with an emphasis on conservation and pollution. The developers of the scale referred to it as Environmental Concern (Weigel and Weigel 1978).

A four-item, five-point Likert-type scale is used to measure a person's belief about the ability and/or desire of government to handle what one perceives to be important matters. This scale was referred to as political trust by Durand and Lambert (1985).

This is a four-item, five-point Likert-type scale measuring a person's perceived inability to influence the political system. This scale was referred to as political efficacy by Durand and Lambert (1985).