Three items are used in this scale to measure how well a person judges his/her performance to have been of a recently completed task.
Three, seven-point items are used to measure the degree to which a person believes that another person (specified) has similar "taste" and judgment in evaluating a certain object.
Seven-point items are used to measure the expressed likelihood that a person would accept the opinion and selection of another person with respect to a particular product choice.
The scale is composed of three questions that are intended to measure the amount of difficulty a person has had in stating reasons for a behavior or decision he/she has made.
The scale has four, seven-point Likert-type statements that measure how much a person places emphasis on the consequences of a decision being made rather than the process being used because of the belief that he/she is responsible for the former rather than the latter.
The scale is composed of four, seven-point Likert-type items that are used to measure the degree to which a person places emphasis on the process of making a decision because of the belief he/she is responsible for the procedure used to make the decision rather than the outcome.
The three-item, five-point scale measures the extent to which one person believes that another person "knows best" in a certain situation. Due to the phrasing of the items and the context in which it was developed, the focus of the scale is on the perceived trust a client has in a specific service provider. The type of service provider studied by Price and Arnould (1999) was a hairstylist.
This four-item, seven-point scale measures the extent to which a person is described by respondents as being organized and capable of doing something. The scale was used by Price and Arnould (1999) for evaluating a hairstylist.
The scale measures the degree to which a person's moral philosophy assumes that the propriety of actions should be judged on the basis of the context of time, culture, and place rather than some set of universal moral rules. Ten, five-point Likert-type items composed the scale.
