The scale uses three, seven-point items to measure a consumer's beliefs about how often he/she has been at a website ready to make a purchase but decided not to finish the transaction when the costs involved (shipping, sales tax, and total amount) were realized at checkout.
This scale is composed of three, seven-point items that measure a consumer's frequency of placing items in a shopping cart at a website but deciding not to checkout because of the willingness to put the purchase on hold in order to look for a better price.
Three, seven-point items are used to measure the perceived value of overall savings in the purchase of two particular products as a set at a certain price. Yadav and Monroe (1993) referred to the measure as total transaction value.
Four, seven-point items are used to measure the perceived level of savings in the purchase of two particular products if purchased separately. Other information provided to respondents indicated that the items could be purchased together as a bundle for a special price. This scale measures their beliefs that savings would be realized even if the items were purchased separately. Yadav and Monroe (1993) referred to the measure as items' transaction value.
This three-item, five-point scale is used to measure a shopper's attitude about the prices associated with a specified store, especially with regard to meat and produce. In the study by Kerin, Jain, and Howard (1992), the scale was used with reference to a shopper's most frequently patronized grocery store.
Five, seven-point Likert-type items are used to measure the extent to which a shopper perceives that a store has high prices and low storewide savings.
This scale has four bipolar adjectives with a seven-point response format and is used for measuring the degree to which a consumer perceives a store to have good buys on its products. The scale was referred to by Dickson and MacLachlan (1990) as price/value.
A four-item, five-point scale is used to measure the importance of several risk attributes related primarily to the performance of some specified product or economic aspects of its purchase.
This is a three-item scale measuring a person's expectation of the likelihood that he/she would shop around for a lower price than that stated in an ad if he/she was in the market for a product like that mentioned in the ad.
Three, seven-point items are used for measuring the degree to which a consumer is satisfied with the product-related aspects of a shopping area. As described subsequently, the shopping area studied by Dawson, Bloch, and Ridgway (1990) was a crafts market.
