consistency
Using three, seven-point Likert-type items, this scale measures a person's belief that the characteristics of a brand (its perceived benefits or concepts) are shared by a particular brand extension. The scale can be used with an extension already on the market or with one in development.
A consumer's belief that a particular brand extension is consistent with and representative of a parent brand is measured using seven, seven-point Likert-type items. The scale can be used with an extension already on the market or with one in development.
The scale measures a person's belief that a particular brand extension has a legitimate connection with the original. The scale can be used with an extension already on the market or with one in development. Three, seven-point Likert-type statements compose the scale.
Three, seven-point Likert-type items are used to measure a person's belief that a particular brand extension upholds and perpetuates the unique meaning of the brand. The scale can be used with an extension already on the market or with one in development.
A person's inconsistent attitude toward an object is measured in this scale using five, seven-point Likert-type items. Chang (2011) used various versions of the scale to measure two constructs: ambivalence toward "green" products and ambivalence toward buying "green" products.
The amount of similarity between one's self and a person in a story is measured in this scale using three, seven-point items.
The scale uses three items to measure the degree to which a consumer believes that a brand is a symbol of the person he/she wants to be.
The scale is composed of forty-two, six-point Likert-type statements that assess the extent to which a person expresses a need for definite answers rather than ambiguity.
Three Likert-type statements with a seven-point response format are used to assess a consumer's desire to patronize just one retailer within a certain product category. This is in contrast to being a regular customer simply out of routine.
The scale has three, seven-point semantic differentials that are intended to measure the degree to which a person believes that the parts of a particular stimulus fit together well.