You are here

Scale Reviews

Find reliable measures for use in your questionnaires. Search Now

Testimonial

This website has truly been a welcome gift! The day pass is extremely affordable & the site is so user friendly to navigate. It provides a wealth of information including, the source, validity, & references for my doctorate research project. I highly recommend this to anyone as it is truly an invaluable research tool!
Suzanne Cromlish, PhD
Saint Xavier University, Chicago

donate

Three, seven-point items measure a person’s self-expressed likelihood of engaging in consumption behaviors over some period of time that are thought to benefit people in the local area.

The likelihood that a person will engage in consumption behaviors over some period of time that are believed to benefit people in another country is measured with four, seven-point items.

The scale measures the degree to which a consumer experiences conflict with regard to purchasing a discounted product linked with a charity.  The conflict is between personally benefitting by saving money and doing something purely to help the charity.  Three, eleven-point Likert-type items compose the scale.

A person’s concern for people in need and the importance placed on personally helping them is measured with five, seven-point items.

Six, seven-point items are used to measure the degree to which a person believes that those in his/her important reference groups (friends, family, co-workers) would approve if he/she donated to charities to help improve social equality.

Five items with a 100 point response scale measure the strength of a person’s belief that his/her donation to a particular charity will help recipients, with an emphasis on improving their social status.

With two- and three-item versions, the scale measures a person’s belief that donating money to charities has a positive effect on one’s happiness.

Rather than focusing on guilt-related feelings, this scale uses four items to measure a person's cognitive appraisal of his/her failure to donate responsibly.

With five, seven-point items, this scale measures a person's reaction to an appeal made by a charitable cause he/she has just read.  Four of the five items could be viewed as an affective response to the appeal but the fifth item taps more into the cognitive facet of the attitude.  Further, given the phrasing of the items, the scale would be most appropriate for use in those situations where it is possible for at least some respondents to be "upset" by what they have read. 

Using three, seven-point semantic differentials, the scale measures a person's expressed likelihood of donating to a particular cause.