You are here

Scale Reviews

Find reliable measures for use in your questionnaires. Search Now

Testimonial

The Marketing Scales website is a gold mine of information.  It is the only source that helps me understand the psychometric quality of the instruments used in past research.  I recommend that researchers bookmark this site . . . they will be back!
Bob Moritz
Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation

sales

The appeal of a price-related sales promotion in a particular business (store or company) is measured with three, seven-point Likert-type items.

The scale is composed of three, seven-point Likert-type items that measure a person’s belief that a particular company’s level of “social responsibility” depends upon the positive effect the activities have on product sales.

How much a person likes a listed sale price is measured with three, seven-point items.  The items do not specify why the consumer likes the price.

With three items, the scale measures the degree to which a consumer believes a lot of effort was spent after a purchase in activity intended to benefit from a price-matching offer.

The importance a shopper places on an online store having deals, sales, and new products is measured in this scale using three, seven-point items.

The scale uses three, nine-point semantic differentials to measure how much a person believes he/she deserves a special offer (sales promotion) made by a business rather than it being unwarranted.

The three item scale measures the extent to which a consumer believes that a lot of effort was spent before a purchase in activity intended to help qualify for the benefit of some type of sales promotion, e.g., collecting coupons to receive price discounts.

Four, seven-point items are used to measure the perceived level of savings in the purchase of two particular products if purchased separately. Other information provided to respondents indicated that the items could be purchased together as a bundle for a special price. This scale measures their beliefs that savings would be realized even if the items were purchased separately. Yadav and Monroe (1993) referred to the measure as items' transaction value.

Four, seven-point items are used to measure the perceived additional value of buying two particular products in a set compared with purchasing them separately. Yadav and Monroe (1993) referred to the measure as bundling transaction value.

This scale is a three-item, seven-point, Likert-type measure assessing a consumer's tendency to purchase just what he/she needs regardless of whether or not products are on sale. The scale was referred to as marginal utility by Lichtenstein, Netemeyer, and Burton (1990)